REHMAT BIBI versus NAAZIR HUSSAIN
Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 and 39 Constitution, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Two competing cases related to the same case were heard by the trial court for the cancellation of the respondent's designated contract while the applicant for the specific performance of the contract. Of The appellate court dismissed the agreement by dismissing the appellants 'claims for special performance and dismissing the respondents' claims. In question, he was executed under repression and illicit influence. Heidi and the trial court did not use the evidence incorrectly and the appellate court's analysis of the evidence would clearly conclude that the agreement was executed in this case. With no independent will of the parties, no coercion or unfair influence was exercised on the respondents The decision of the respondents was referred to the High Court judgment and the decree dismissing the document and for the specific performance of the contract. The appellants' case was dismissed, while it was dismissed as an appellate court, under which the appellant claimed certain performance and the respondents were rejected for canceling the contract, Restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Sakrand lawyer