Find a Lawyer

SAJAWAL versus SAUBIA HAMID

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Consequently, suit for declaration with relief praying, the legitimate courts, respectively, found that the plaintiff had a question for declaration with a claim pending. There was no possession of land in the case. Unable to retain relief by the plaintiff The applicant's case was not secure, the High Court was obliged to dismiss the petition for leave to appeal against such finding, only on the score below, Based on the contents of the records found simultaneously that were registered. The power of attorney, the execution which was admitted by the plaintiff was not a fraud and it was the original document by which the plaintiff authorized his lawyer to sell the land in question to the defendant. No certification was required, therefore, no need to submit a certificate. The witness, however, was not brought before the SU, after being brought before the High Court, after the following courts exercised their conscious mind on relevant evidence and appreciated the evidence in accordance with the law, in an unknown decision 'S weakness was not shown, in which case the appeal was denied immigration advocates from Dadakhel lawyer