Find a Lawyer

SA\'ADSHARIF versus SAADATALISHAH,MANAGINGDIRECTOR,NATIONALPOLICE FOUNDATION,ISLAMABAD

R19 (3) Appeal for rehabilitation of an appeal filed by a public servant was dismissed by the service tribunal when the retracted government employee filed a miscellaneous petition requesting that, in view of the commitment made by the authority, In which the appeal was withdrawn, the authority was not fulfilled, the order of removal was not in accordance with the appeal law passed by the service tribunal which could be withdrawn and the appeal could be restored by the service tribunal. Undoubtedly, an appeal under R 19 (3) of the Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct) 1974 can be restored if it is not prosecuted. Excluded , But did not have the power to modify his own order that the public servant was personally present at the hearing of the appeal and it was on his statement that the miscellaneous application filed by the public servants was dismissed as mistaken. The appeal could not be restored. , Dismissed property advocates from Chaman lawyer