Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the magistrate and the inspector of evidence before the raiding section 161 were neither appreciated nor the complainant seen the money transferred, Nor did they listen to the conversation. The space between them and their evidence, therefore, could not be made the basis for the conviction of the accused complainant to be a pernicious witness, its statement not sufficient to be punished if it was not substantiated by irrefutable evidence. Yes, the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
