MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), section 161, praised the evidence it recorded in its preliminary statement before the raiding magistrate, which was of special importance. Was that the complainant accepted the money from the recovery. The accused's money was also proved that the complainant's statement was confirmed along with the accused's statement and his recovery also proved the accused's guilt, though the accused accepted the bribe money. He accepted. His medical officer, who was neither presented as a witness nor acting as an accused. The accused faced a lengthy trial, while the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sheikhupura lawyer
