CENTRAL COTTON MILLS LIMITED versus ATLAS BOT LEASE CO. LIMITED
Sections 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 (1973), Pakistan (1973), reached the Constitution Petition Compliance Suite for the settlement of Article 199 suit on the terms of the agreement according to which the lenders were to be contracted. Was. After payment of the disputes through the decree, after the order was approved, the lenders / applicants filed an application under section 12 (2), CPC, which claimed that the applicants were public Being a limited company, a lawsuit cannot be filed unless there is an option granted by it. After hearing the parties, the Board of Directors Banking Tribunal rejected the request and instead of filing an appeal before the High Court against the order of the Banking Tribunal, the constitutional petition was filed against the Banking Tribunal. An appeal was filed against the order, a constitutional petition was filed against the order, the applicant was not able to cure the appeal because he did not benefit from it, the constitutional application filed by him was ineligible.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Shikarpur lawyer