Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAFFER versus ZIA-UL-ISLAM SHAH

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) The personal need of the landlord who was doing import and export business and was the sole agent of a foreign company in Pakistan, he claimed that he moved abroad and ten After a considerable period of the year, his business collapsed due to his absence from Pakistan and Landorworld presented evidence to show that he wants to start a new business in the midst of conflict. Could not find that his import and export business had fallen and failed to establish his true need in this regard. His desire for premises in the dispute was tempered by greed and misconduct as it has been fully proven that the site of the dispute is located in a reclaimed area and the landlord's request to evict the tenant from the premises. Was encouraged that even after evacuating the premises, more rent and collection of beautiful money could be exempted by Pagland before Ard filed any eviction application against the tenant. Another shop had to be vacated by the tenant and it was proved that the landlord had another business premises. He was where he was business, but the fact that the landlord had run, thus suppressing material facts because he was guilty of turning the controller hired illegal hands. online advocate from Khanqah Dogran lawyer