Find a Lawyer

WAHEEDA SHAFI versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

Supreme Court Rules Order 1980 R27 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, RI The Supreme Court decision petitioner applied for his admission on the ground that, His father almost served the institution. Seven years, therefore, in his view, R 27 11's, Category \ M \, Prospectus, 1994, was classified as a matter of right to be admitted to BSc Engineering University, authorities The petitioner had not accepted Petitioner S. Constitution. The petition, the application for an intra-court appeal and leave for appeal did not result, petitioner's request for a review of the Supreme Court's decision was that R 27 11 (b), University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila Prospectus, 1994 If read as a whole, they will cover the applicant's case for admission, despite the fact that his father had already left university. The applicant had further plea that the existing law had to be enforced by the court whether it was the same or not. The points raised by the applicant in his notice at the hearing of the case will require further scrutiny, so admission was made for regular hearing. family advocate from Jamshoro lawyer