Find a Lawyer

KAILA KHAN versus YASIN

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Investigating the fact that the plaintiff's claim on premature consolidation was not accepted by the seller was the son of the seller. Consequently, the trial court did not accept it. Although the First Appellate and High Court dismissed their claim, based on the evidence, the plaintiff agreed that the seller's son was proved because he was not questioned by the defendant in cross examination. Therefore, such a statement would be construed as admitting that no weakness was identified in the High Court decision under which it affirmed the first Appellate Court decision in which the claimant with the seller That was found in his favor through the concurrent decisions of the following courts. This was primarily a question of fact and Similar results. Was not bothered to read any misunderstanding or evidence online advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer