KALSOOM MALIK versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 188 supersedes the rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, O XXVI, R1 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XLVII, R1, mandatory provisions O XXVI, R 1, Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, The Supreme Court may review its decision or order in a civil proceeding on the same grounds as set forth in O XLVII, R 1. The CPC is reviewed as such when a new and important case or evidence is discovered. Has been practiced for some reason. Not in the knowledge of any party or may not be presented by such party when the order or decree has been approved under the review, the exercise of the review may also be valid before the record or to a large extent due to any mistake or omission. This is because there was an attempt to review the Judgment by considering each point, which was raised, and no new matter or evidence emerged that was not available at the time of the hearing. The case was heard before the judgment hearing, there was a lack of admission to review the decision. In addition, it was not identified in the decision to identify any error or error in view of the record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Taxila lawyer