MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus BASHIR AHMAD
The law appoints the sole witness as a commission by the Appellate Court to conduct an Inquiry Order 1984 Article 33 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXVI, R9 and Section 115 commissions based on your statement of appeal. Does for But his statement was not recorded by the court for the appointment of sole witness as the referee defendant applied for such appointment in court but was summarized in the sole witness court. On which the plaintiff's appeal was accepted and the order of appointment of his case was pronounced. The sole witness, the action taken by him, and the decisions and decisions made by the appellate court, the business proceedings conducted by the sole witness indicate that he did not act as a referee but as an arbitrator or local commissioner. As the sole witness was not based on his personal information but the material obtained through the rent from other sources and the material collected is not possible without cross-examination by the parties even if the contract is cross-examined. The appointment of the solitary witness was made with the consent of the parties, but the plaintiff's petition was still before the Appellate Court. Be sure that it does not trust him, will present contract. The decision based on the statement of the solitary witness between the parties for the appointment of a single witness was also illegal, as the agreement between the parties was terminated before the statement was recorded, the mere witness could not be settled on the mere agreement by the court. Was. When the parties were present in the court, the appellate court examined the evidence of the parties present before the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Kabir Wala lawyer