ZIA FARHAT versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SPECIAL COURT (BANKING)
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Bail, no witness grant was cited in the FIR, which was filed with delay of more than nine hours. The complainant was a married man and according to his marriage contract he was 18 years of age and the accused was the same age, so in order to commit unnatural crime, he had to convince the first man to be a common man. No appeal was made, residents of the area took an oath that no such incident had happened. Medeso's legal report was not in favor of the prosecution because the doctor who examined the medically affected / complainant did not see any signs of violence on his body and did not have any abnormalities on his part. Since the condition was not observed, the challan was already presented to the court, but the accused was in judicial custody as his arrest (fourth month) could not be held indefinitely and the bail was granted. Could not be stopped because the accused was punished, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
