TARIQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SAHIWAL
During the provision of section 5 and first marriage of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, the maintenance maintenance suit for the husband had contracted the second marriage without the permission of his first wife which the plaintiff's husband had taken care of the plaintiff's wife. She has left her home and was living separately on her own; she was unable to claim reinstatement, was absolutely baseless because the husband did not file restitution of marital rights against the plaintiff's wife and the defendant husband. The second contention that the marriage contract was fake was not even objectionable. He had initiated proceedings for the termination of the marriage, but had no power in the eyes of the law simply because he had falsely implicated the wife of the alleged plaintiff as a husband. The lawsuit was to be canceled. The question of allowing the care of legally married persons has had no legal effect on the wife, especially when the defendant's husband admitted in his written statement that the plaintiff was his legally married wife. On the record on the evidence it is proved that the plaintiff's husband was a landlord who owned 25 acres of agricultural land under the care of the two courts below the rate of Rs. 500, the proper and reasonable basis for the income source of her husband. Keeping watch
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Tank lawyer