RAFIQUE BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE
On the record of section 10 and 11 house ownership of the IDPs (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, it is clearly proved that after the death of the deceased, in the case of payment of the price, the property resided by the Department, The predecessor had transferred the interest. The decree was issued - therefore, he was the special transfer and the landlord, and his predecessor challenged such transfer through the constitutional petition, which was dismissed as a retroactive claim. Such a transfer was not challenged prior to the forum transfer order. To the extent of such a house, the defendants were awarded their title and the defendants would be considered joint owners of such house. About the remaining ards of the property, however, will be entitled to 3/4 of the 2/3 share, that is, after the deduction of 1/4 of the widow.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Lasbela lawyer
