Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD

Sec 13 and 35 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act 1991 dismiss the case for dismissal of the suit because of the failure of the High Court to fulfill the requirements under the pre-emption Act 1991, the plaintiff's application for dismissal. Deleted. The judgment and decree passed by the High Court Competition, the new lease of life, was granted only to those suits that were established or pending between August 1986 and March 28, 1990, and in any such case, any decree, decision or The preliminary dismissal order was passed under section 35 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, that such dismissal would have no legal effect and before the implementation of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act 1991 The matter can be restored within 60 days. On 22 10 1983, his earlier writ petition was initially decided by the trial court on 21 5 1987 as contained in section 35 (1), applicable to the facts of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, Because the trial court did not reject the case but it was ruled under Section 35, Punjab Prevention Act 1991, however, only those cases which were pre-emptively claimed under the right. had gone. The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, wherein the plaintiff had to declare his requisite student in case the student did not meet his required requirement, did not fall within the four corners of section 35 (1) of the High Court Act in the initial period of the case. ? The litigation dismissed the plaintiff's claim on this score, thus, under section 35 (1), the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 cannot be revived. online advocate from Arifwala lawyer