SECRETARY,GOVERNMENTOFPUNJAB,FORESTRY,WILDLIFEANDTOURISMDEPARTMENT,LAHORE versus MUHAMMADMASOOD(RETD.)D.F.O.
Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification & Discipline) Rules 1975 R 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employee failed to deduct income tax from auction buyer for certain amount during his employment, Government employee's retirement After such money was summoned, the service tribunal did not dispute that the department, against the government employees, was not punished after the department received the compensation paid to the government employees by the department. Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules did not initiate any action against public servants under the 1975 Act: Government Mill The opportunity of hearing or assigning responsibility for the land against the proposed action cannot be discounted in any way, so the service tribunal employee should be instructed to stop the collection of the alleged amount and instruct the department. He must first act according to the law. There was no question of a law of public importance for the public servant's obligation to recover this amount. In this case, the leave to appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
