Find a Lawyer

HUMAYUN BADSHAH versus HABIB BANK LTD.

Section 25A Habib Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules, 1981, R6 Efficiency and Discipline (Bank and Financial Institutions) Rules, 1975, Art 4 to 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Decision to hold separate decisions The Court's constitutional jurisdiction, by exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, could order the Labor Appellate Tribunal of the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction's tribunal to be terminated if it concluded that the ruling was without legal authority. And has no legal effect where a court or tribunal has jurisdiction and adjudication. The specific question cannot be attributed to any unlawful interference or material irregularity because of the fact or even the wrong decision has been made on the issue of law when the Labor Tribunal (Utility and Discipline) And financial institutions) rules, 1975, and erroneously found that the charge sheet was issued by the unqualified authority of the High Court, thus, there was a legal jurisdiction to be declared by the Labor Tribunal. To the extent that orders without legal authority were upheld by the Labor Appellate Tribunal, the disturbing results of the fact were recorded. Could not have reached the correct conclusion about the fact-finding plane's Labor Appellate Tribunal on re-examination of the evidence in its original context. While directing the rehabilitation of the employees, it was reasonably advantageous that the terminus qua ruling would have a history of reimbursing employees, the High Court's decision was set aside by the Supreme Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal The operating part of the decision is the circumstances best advocate from Dhirkot lawyer