Sections 4 324, 7 337F (II) and q 34 Contempt of murder, committing acts of cowardice, actions taken by several persons in the presentation of joint intent, testimony of the injured person / witness, potential importance / Importance The benefit of the doubt is that such witnesses will not be testified against the victim's seal witnesses. The testimony of the injured witness cannot be considered in isolation from the other material evidence on record, and such testimony requires free association with the evidence of the circumstances, especially when the previous citizen's enmity and criminal litigation between the parties. There was a recognized fact that no vacancy was recovered from the site where the accused was shown in the vacancy project. The ocular account was not proven by circumstantial evidence that it was alleged that there was a lame person and it could not be complained that the complainant had fled after being fired on the site. The plan contradicts the contradictory account of the place where the accused fired at the complainant pro The secretariat had to prove his case beyond doubt, even a slight suspicion that enabled the suspect to take advantage of the suspect. Yes, the prosecution's case was not beyond doubt and the accused's conviction was set aside.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
