Find a Lawyer

MST. MEHER TAJA versus NASEER MUHAMMAD

Section 115 jurisdictional jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the court is not interfered with, but not when the misrepresentation and misreading of the evidence and the misuse of the law in the face of the record. It became compulsory when floating. Interrupting such conclusions because non-interference with such conclusions of fact would result in abortion of justice

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• FAHID ULLAH KHAN v. Mst. DIL PAZIR JAN 2015 PCrLJ 873
• Mst. Dr. SABINA IMRAN v. Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM 2015 YLR 887
• SIBTAIN ALI SHAH v. State 2015 PCrLJ 890
• HABEEB ULLAH v. State 2015 YLR 894
• AURANGZEB v. State 2015 YLR 912
• ALAMGIR v. State 2015 PCrLJ 919
• GUL FARAZ alias PALEY KHAN v. State 2015 YLR 925
• FARID ULLAH v. State 2015 MLD 927

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

criminal advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes