Find a Lawyer

JAM MANZOOR AHMAD versus DIRECTOR (FOOD), PUNJAB, LAHORE

Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975 Rr 7 & 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Inquiry Penalty Dispensary Proceedings against a Government Employee Neither the statements of witnesses were recorded nor evidence presented Any opportunity to do so was given to the civil servant in defense, instead the inquiry officer had heard orally the inquiry officer had not decided that the public servant had been employed by the Punjab Government under R4 (competence and discipline). ) Rules, 1975 and the Authority ordered the inquiry officer, the authorized officer and the authority's authority to collect huge sums of money. Proportional to the finding that the civil servant was not responsible for the shortage of wheat, which, under his control, overlooked the natural reasons for the simultaneous search of the three responsible officers and led to his own decision. But the decision was made alternative. s and forecasts, accepting the appeal of a public servant, the Service Tribunal's order was set aside and remanded by the Inquiry Officer for a fresh inquiry into the case for appointment of an Inquiry Officer, which is a law of the Supreme Court. And according to the observations. In the case of Mukhtar Ahmad Bhatti, SCMR 1864 of 1992 was reported divorce advocates from Ghazi lawyer