ASAD ULLAH KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Articles 9, 202020, 8 468, and the Act (II of the Prevention of Corruption (II of 1947)), Section (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts,, 10 10, and Constitution 199 Constitution through the Constitution. Applicants applying for FIR termination, using fraudulent, fraudulent and fraudulently supplied property, fraudulently intended for fraud, using forged documents as fraudulent documents. Along with the status quo, the existence of the Police Station Anti-Corruption Establishment in Malakand was also questioned as the constitution was violated on this basis and neither The Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1947, nor the West Pakistan Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance, 1961, was extended by the President Pakistan to the tribal areas; therefore, they were operating without authority, which traced the history of legality. Done, held that the Anti-Corruption Establishment was operating according to law and constitution in the tribal areas of Peshawar Division at the time, including S. Dir and Chitral Police Station, established under the Anti-Corruption Establishment, under the Constitution. Was working in which the relevant law case was backed up, filed against the applicant / accused Or, the High Court can not control or intervene in the matter in accordance with law. The investigation, which is the only anti-corruption agency case, cannot be factually investigated by the High Court under the constitutional jurisdiction, wanting to abolish the FIR, while filing charges against them through trial. The only alternative was to raise the objection. Some evidence under section 265K or 249A
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
