SYED GHAZI GULAB JAMAL versus PRESIDING OFFICER, ELECTION TRIBUNAL, PESHAWAR
Section 54 (b) and (63 (a) of the Code of Conduct, 1985, R1 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Election Application Schedule and Annexure) No Name of Returned Candidate (Defendant) of Returning Candidate The effect was that the Election Tribunal did not reject the election application as scheduled and was not affiliated with it. Under Section 63 (a) of the Public Representation Act 1976 for failure to comply with such requirement of law An electoral application can be dismissed, as stated in its amending clause. Compliance with the essential and mandatory provisions of Representation of People Act 1976 (b) ) Did not cite the schedules and affiliations of the respondents, such requirement was provided under Code of Conduct, 1985, R1, before the Election Tribunal and although the word \ will be used But non-compliance was not cited as a prerequisite and was sufficient to handle it. The directory in nature was denied, according to the law set by the Election Tribunal. Strictly exercising their jurisdiction, the High Court interfered with the order passed by the Election Tribunal PRO the circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
