ZAFAR ALI versus THE STATE
Evidence of the prosecution's testimony on the recording of the evils on section 6, 7 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 336 Otz Act (X of 1873) [as amended by Federal Laws (Amendment Declaration) Ordinance (XXVII of 1981). Are listed. Not on oath, not on oath Such a request was resisted by the defendants claiming non-recording evidence on oath, this evidence would not be admissible; by amending section 6 of the Oaths Act, 1873, the Federal Laws Revised Declaration Ordinance, 1981 The witness was required to take the oath and even in accordance with section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1873, all the courts were obliged to take the oath from the witnesses in the prescribed amended form of the oath, by the prosecution to restore the witnesses' testimony. The filing of evidence on the affidavit filed was rightly accepted by the lower courts because for the accused No prejudice is likely. They will certainly provide a fair opportunity to include cross examination and appropriate evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Patika lawyer