NAAZREEN AKHTAR versus FAMILY JUDGE
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 18 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Suite The applicant (woman) who was a citizen of India went to Pakistan to meet her sisters and other relatives in Lahore. Married to the defendant, but no relationship was reached when his visa expired and he had to leave Pakistan. The respondent had to manage his passport and other necessary for a woman requesting citizenship of Pakistan. The papers later found out that the defendant was an addict and had a bad reputation in the community and had committed fraud in his identity card and, therefore, his immigration papers could not be prepared for the respondents' marital rights. After being sued for rehabilitation and finding out about the aforementioned case, the lawyer for the general counsel It was affirmed by the High Commission of Pakistan in India, before the petitioner was executed by the Family Court General Power of Attorney, before it was sued to dissolve the marriage. The said lawyer is fully competent and has the power to condemn the applicant in all matters, proceedings, cases. Pending or running in any court, whenever and wherever his presence / attendance was deemed necessary under the law, the Family Court dismissed the applicant's claim for dissolution of marriage as such The suit cannot be entertained on the basis of the General Power of Attorney, in which it was not held that the said lawyer had been given the option to set up a lawsuit to dissolve the marriage. Family Court Joe
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Multan lawyer