PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION versus MUHAMMD AZAM KATPER
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 The employment services of employees were transferred to other mills by mutual consent and at the time of transfer the final pay certificate was issued stating that the employees show a continuation of the terms and conditions. And enjoy other perks and facilities. After the employees took charge of the transfer mill and started work, they were told that their previous services at the mill where they were transferred would not be counted for the purpose of sanity and other The condition of the employees was the matter of transfer and not the new appointment at the transfer mill and the terms and conditions of the services of the employees remained the same as per the PayPal Certificate issued to the employees at the time of transfer which provided them with facilities and allowances. As mentioned, employees may not have such rights through a transferee mill to unilaterally inform them of their desks. Dantage employees, without being taken, were thus entitled to the privileges received by them at the mill from which they were exchanged and could not be deprived of them by the transfer mill.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
