EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, FEEDER DIVISION, LEFT BANK BARRAGE COLONY, HYDERABAD, SINDH versus SARDAR ALI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4) (a), 2 (i) and Section O12 Workman System Complainant Retaining the Petition The employee, who was appointed on a monthly salary of about Rs 800 per month on a work charge, was not a civil servant because the person who worked under Section 2 (b) (II) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 Employed on the basis of the charge of or was paid an emergency salary, not a civil servant, the employee was not a worker as he was not working in an industrial or commercial establishment. Yes, there were twenty or more people employed, nor did they come under the definition of worker under the Workworks Compensation Act, 1923. Nor was the employee's request for a complaint against the termination of employment under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, under the Factories Act 1934.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
