Find a Lawyer

ZEAL-PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD., HYDERABAD versus SHAUKAT ALI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Apprenticeship Ordinance (LVI of 1962), Sections 4, 10 and 13 West Pakistan Apprenticeship Rules, 1966, R23 Complaint Maintenance Petitioner was appointed as a Trade Apprentice in the Respondent Factory Get training in various jobs. The applicant, who had not been re-employed by the respondent factory after the completion of his training period, but was allowed to leave, was allowed to go under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. A complaint was filed earlier in which he claimed that he was a worker and that his services could not be terminated after completion of his three-year term as Apprentice Rule 23 of the West Pakistan Apprenticeship Rules 1966. Provided that the employer must offer an appointment to an apprentice upon completion of his or her apprenticeship. It is not. Serving the employer after the completion of the apprenticeship after the completion of the door will be required to be part of the apprenticeship applicant was allowed to go through the respondent factory and the complaint filed by the applicant in accordance with the rules Could not be maintained under. immigration advocates phone number from Tharparkar lawyer