WASEEM AHMED versus AZEEM TEXTILE & GARMENTS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4) (a) Complaint Petition Complaint filed against Job Suspension The employer was resisted by the company working at the head office of the company where the employee worked, there were less than twenty workers and it was governed by shops and establishment ordinances, the statement of the employees that the employer company The head office where he worked was twenty-nine workers, employer company Burden did not prove that the employer employed twenty or more workers. Were present, although the employee, but the employee once it was displayed in the twenty or more employer-employee company, the company was to reject the job. There is evidence that after the completion of this work, the employer company could not insist that the complaints were not maintained. There were less than twenty employees in its head office and it was under the Shops and Establishment Ordinance, 1965. Used to walk
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer