ALI ASHRAF SHAHGILLANI,REVENUE TEHSILDAR versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMUAND KASHMIR,MUZAFFARABAD
R7 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Section 4 Publicity Respondents, junior civil servants were promoted, while Rule 7 was ignored as appellant senior, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Additional Assistant Commissioners (Recruitment). And promotion) rules, 1980. When it was promoted in 1992, it must be a university graduate and must pass the departmental examination, when it was developed in 1992, before being appointed as additional assistant commissioner respondents. Were graduates at the time and had passed the departmental examination, thus, were eligible for appointment through the development appellant, did not possess the required qualifications at that critical time, ie, he was neither a graduate nor had passed the departmental examination. He was not officially promoted who was not eligible for employee development and was not an affected person, Ur appeal was ineligible under section 4. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Piplan lawyer