SADIQALI(RETIRED)ASSISTANTENGINEER/S.D.O.,P.W.D.,MUZAFFARABAD,AZADKASHMIR versus CHIEFSECRETARY,AZADJAMMUANDKASHMIRGOVERNMENT,MUZAFFARABAD
Section & 44 & Azad and Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Section 5 Terms and Conditions of Government Employees in the jurisdiction of the High Court where the matter relates to the terms and conditions of the Government employee, for the resolution of the High Court Cannot have constitutional jurisdiction. From the Service Tribunal, Section 5, created under the Service Tribunals Act 1975, has all the powers of which the Civil Court matters, which relates to the terms and conditions of a public servant, to the High Court in this case There was no jurisdiction which could provide relief. As the constitutional jurisdiction is arbitrary, where no government employee has complied with the Prime Minister's order, which is a violation of the law, no mandatory order can be issued against the relevant government employee, the Prime Minister's Chief Secretary. Cannot instruct you to execute your development order. The constitutional request is found to be against the law, therefore, the employee of the promotion was unable to enforce the order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
