PARVAIZAKHTAR versus CHIEFCONSERVATOROFFORESTS,AZADGOVERNMENTOFTHESTATEOFJAMMUANDKASHMIR,MUZAFFARABAD
R 10 Appeal to Service Tribunal Qualifications Government servants (appellants) were promoted by the Conservator of Forest, against whom no appeal was filed by the Chief Conservator of Forests, however, the Foresters / Forest Guards. On a letter received by the association, he took notice. Affiliated public servants challenged the order of the Chief Conservator of Forests on the issue that an appeal was filed by a public servant against their development because of a violation of the relevant department rules. Was not done, he had no jurisdiction to pass. Neutral order neither had the power to modify the automobile, the conservator forests could not abolish the order of conservative forests in the presence of any appeal before it, nor could it order the automobile. Must confirm to change. The Conservator of Forests appellants, however, did not succeed because the defective order was linked to their terms and conditions of service. The CE was not previously challenged before the Appellate Forum because according to the law, the appeals were disqualified and dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Sibi lawyer