MUHAMMAD YASIN versus ALI MUHAMMAD
The Indemnity Rental Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (ii) places the main burden on the landlord to prove the default in payment of rent, and after the removal of such an attack by him, it is left to the tenant. To indicate that no default was actually made. And the rent was paid consistently during the legal proceedings, holding that the rent receipt was not issued by the landlord at any time even though the landlord regularly received rent through it. Was made when he requested a non-payment of rent receipt by the landlord in writing. The statement, it is important that the evidence for the landlord be denied in its affidavit, but it did not justify the landlord's silence on any reasonable ground that the tenant's request was valid and the rent There cannot be contradictory witnesses presented by the plaintiff. The tenant was also able to prove to the tenant that the supported version of the situation, in the circumstances that the landlord was actually paying the rent, but the landlord refused to issue a reception with his IPT
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer