Find a Lawyer

H. B. L. versus PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL PROMOTERS (PVT) LTD., KARACHI

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Respondents to refund certain funds through fraudulent checks through fraudulent checks which relate to the jurisdiction of the Federal Content in such case. The purpose of the Office of the Delegate Ombudsman Order, 1983, is to investigate, investigate, remedy and rectify any injustice committed to a person. Thus, there was jurisdiction in the case which originated from the bank's misconduct. The specific amount was illegally withdrawn from the defendant's account by fraudulent Beers check, which was obtained on the basis of fraudulent fraudulent slip bank. Who acknowledged that the fraud was done and that it is being said that the amount of fraud was withdrawn, and was not directly and indirectly involved in the example. That the fraud, past facts, would result in the bank being responsible for its own mistakes and misconduct as well as corruption, as well as the commission. N failed to perform its duties and responsibilities, as it was assigned to the bank, in the event of fraudulent negligence in the face of fraudulent bearing checks. It will not be mentioned that the success of the accused was challenged by this constitutional petition which is pending that there was no effect in deferring the decision of the Federal Ombudsman for the matter. Allegations before the court were to the extent of criminal liability of the culprits and had nothing to do with the civil liability borne by the bank due to corruption [bankers and clients]. immigration advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer