FATEH ALI versus TRUSTEES OF HAJI SIR ABDULLAH HAROON WAKF NO. 2, KARACHI
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (vi), 19 (4) and 20 Laws (10 of 1984), Article 134 Reconstruction of premises to the tenant on the basis of the reconstruction of the premises of the cross examination house. Had to be evicted. Approval plan for reconstruction was prepared by the authorized authority; such approval scheme was objected to by the tenant, the tenant controller summoned the authorized authority officials at the request of the landlord. To prepare the approval plan and the relevant documents were submitted by the competent authority to the Rent Controller and the duly approved approval plan and other documents were prepared. The officers presented only the documents and testified that through the constructive authority. The house was approved for reconstruction and approved The project was officially approved. The landlord's request cannot be borne by the landlord e is considered as evidence in the eyes of the law and, in the absence of legality, the landlord's permit for the removal of the landlord will be inadmissible. The tenant's argument was canceled in view of the fact that the officers of the authorized authority were not summoned as witnesses. The landlord and he were not given any oath, but he appeared to present only the documents under which he was authorized as a representative of the competent authority provisions of section 19 (4) of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979. Documents issued by, provided that there is no interest in this matter, no right to be financially given to the tenant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
