Find a Lawyer

SHAHID-UL-QAYYUM versus FEDERATIONOFPAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) The loss of mismanaged store items was reduced to the lowest rank for a period of three years and the penalty for widespread fines, withholding the next annual increase for three years, and recovery of loss of store items. ? Imposed order by the Department Authority Service Tribunal on government employees, however, amended the pending order, so as to reduce the penalty for stopping the two-year increase by imposing a two-year period. Applicant was put in the office, and therefore the applicant's fault was that he did not receive the written consent of the officer on whose instructions it was directed That the air conditioner was purchased and it was not proven. Whether the applicant was directly responsible for the shortage of store items and thus there is no reasonable basis for awarding a penalty to the applicant, the present argument of the petitioner was that, because of finding the service tribunal, the applicant was required to testify. The inquiry was not allowed, so the inquiry concluded that it could not form the basis of any prejudicial proceedings against the applicant and the appeal was granted. Consider increasing the debate The appeal was also granted in the appeal filed by the government against the applicant against the reduction of his sentence by the service tribunal. immigration advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer