Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADBAKHSHAWAN versus CHIEFENGINEER,IRRIGATIONZONE,BAHAWALPUR

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Promotion Petitioners (Government Employees) who joined the pre-service rather than the respondents were their senior as the sub divisional clerk on the duty of junior clerks respondents initially in 1987. As progress was made, neglect of the applicants, the proposed department's examination was terminated in the same year while the applicant was subsequently approved and the promotion of the respondents was regularly regularized from the date of promotion. And they were regularly promoted to account clerks, followed by the 1990s Voters passed the examination request department in 1990, was promoted regular 29 9 1990, the same date, the applicants responded to the further development accounts killer was appealed to the Tribunal Service. For promotion in 1990, the respondents who were with C were compensated in 1987, therefore, the Super Session of the Applicants was properly promoted in 1987 which did not pass the required departmental examination till then. And the Service Tribunal, which did not qualify for the development, correctly stated that by that time, the applicants had passed the department examination in 1990 and they were promoted, the respondents were eligible for further publicity as Accounts Clerks, Because he served 3 years as an account clerk for respondents, he served 3 years as an accountant, therefore, Sana which was open to all developed divisional status. Clerks of 1990, they had to wait another three years for development because the Accounts Clerk Service Tribunal had taken up the matter. online advocate from Rohri lawyer