Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE


Pakistan Panel Code Section 161 Pakistan of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) members of the raiding party had neither heard the conversation between the complainant and the accused at the relevant time nor had the bribe amounted as evidence to the accused. Was seen moving through. There was a physically unhappy puppy who was allegedly taken to the police station but did not suffer any recovery. It was backed by credible defense evidence, although independent witnesses were available at the time of the incident, no attempt was made to join them to look into the alleged recovery of the bribe. Evidence from the accused of money and the interest of police officers was not enough to record the crime. The threat was foreseen as a result. That the complainant and his accompanying villagers will be involved in a criminal case or that the leave of appeal has been changed in the circumstances under appeal and accordingly the accused has been acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Sita Road lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.