NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus GENERAL TRACTOR AND MACHINERY CO. LTD.
Law Evidence Art 1984 Arts, 3, 73, 74, ofte, written and document 78 Document Content Writing Statement The effect of the document on the effect of the document, through the primary or secondary evidence, from the Arts 72 72, according to the law. Must prove. E-Evidence, 1984 The contents of the document were not proof of its authenticity or its authenticity document must be proved under Art 78; the authenticity or authenticity of this document by proof of the signature and handwriting of the Conan e testimony. Must be proven by legal means. With regard to the evidence or its contents or other evidence on the record which the court deemed sufficient evidence to substantiate its authenticity or fact in its discretion, the defendants did not have the question, the documents admitted in the document, and any In any case, the same shall be deemed to have been substantially proved by his entry in the written statement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
