Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADIRFAN versus POSTMASTERGENERAL

Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1973 R 3 (2) Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), OI, RR 8, 9 and 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application containing positions in BPS I Is. Petitioners claimed that the notification, which was issued on 8th April 11 1988, laid down procedures, qualifications and conditions for the appointment of those questioners whose claimants had been appointed by the concerned Minister for such posts. The application was made but nevertheless they were not appointed but other persons (not made party to the constitutional petition) were appointed and the appointments made by the authority had no legal effect. To order the appointment of the number of persons who have been sought to have legal powers and to be declared invalid. The applicant did not make such an appointment as the party to the constitutional petition could not receive relief in the nature of a warrant. Ability to apply the principle contained in OI, R 8, CPC: Individuals who were tried but did not have to be sued were specific and well-known applicants. They were constitutional petitioners to allow certain appointments to take effect. An application will be made after two years, which will have a limit. Impose a premium on the applicant's conduct in order to allow the necessary parties to operate at such a desolate stage, especially when the applicant's conduct shows that such necessary parties to the applicants are intended And were left for unnecessary reasons so that orders could be obtained in the absence of them. The rule that if the necessary parties are not included, the case will be when you need a advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer