Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, sections 161 and 343/34 of the Code of Conduct, Section H of the relevant police station, were prosecuted and the complainant's brother was imprisoned and He was sentenced for unlawful taking. There was no evidence against him, but the accused was not present at the relevant police station when it was alleged that the money was handed over to the co-accused and not to the co-accused or the prosecution witness. The money was received, he made a statement that the money received for or on behalf of the accused himself would not be enough to convict the accused where even the partner against the accused does not prove his case. Could not the entire evidence brought to the record do not indicate that the money was seen by the co-accused and the complainant of the conscience. advocate for immigration from Lakki Marwat lawyer