Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MAHMOODAHMAD versus THE STATE


Section 249A, Section 249A & 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 298C and 188 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) application filed by the accused under CRPC Termination The CRPC dismissed the trial court review petition against the aforesaid. The order administered by the Sessions Court was also rejected, instead of requesting the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 6161A, the PC accused be charged under section 9619A, CRPC petition. application on9A, the CRPC should have approached the High Court only after the decision of its application. The order was not manageable, unless otherwise stated in the statements of the FIR and the prosecution witnesses, the above orders of both courts did not face any kind of illegal interference or request for material misconduct. Was excluded within the same limits.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Tall lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.