MAHMOODAHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 249A, Section 249A & 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 298C and 188 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) application filed by the accused under CRPC Termination The CRPC dismissed the trial court review petition against the aforesaid. The order administered by the Sessions Court was also rejected, instead of requesting the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 6161A, the PC accused be charged under section 9619A, CRPC petition. application on9A, the CRPC should have approached the High Court only after the decision of its application. The order was not manageable, unless otherwise stated in the statements of the FIR and the prosecution witnesses, the above orders of both courts did not face any kind of illegal interference or request for material misconduct. Was excluded within the same limits.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Tall lawyer