Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus RANA & SONS

Respondents in the jurisdiction over appointment of arbitrator in terms of the agreement between the parties 8 and 20 of the Arbitration Act 1940 had requested in the court that section 8 of the Act for appointment of appellant for appellant's appointment Object to jurisdiction based on. This agreement was brought under consideration. The work was also performed on `K. Therefore, the LL had no jurisdiction to appoint a court to arbitrate, in the terms of the Arbitration Act, 1940 of the appointment of the arbitrator, if the notice was not made within 15 days after the service of the party. At the request of the court, the person who gave such notice may make the appointment. Under the agreement between the parties of the arbitrator / umpire, notice service will be required for the appointment. The request for appointment of arbitrator, if such notice is moved without service, will be prematurely dismissed or processed. For the reason, therefore, the defendant at L at L has the jurisdiction to decide the application under Sections 8 and 20, on the failure of the appellant to appoint an arbitral civil court on L Civil L, Arbitration Act, 1940, filed by defendant top advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer