KHALID IQBAL versus THE STATE
Full evidence of Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail and statements of the accused under S342, CR PC, the case was likely to be concluded soon and to examine the merits of the case at such a stage. Was not appropriate The record, which the complainant kept in his or her affidavit, strongly expressed doubts about the release of the accused on bail and also disclosed the threat posed to him by the accused. Aziz and Iqarb also made three reports against the complainant regarding the commission of various offenses, one of which was proved wrong after the inquiry that the accused had harassed the complaining party after being released on bail in the background. The possibility of being excluded also cannot be ruled out. It was about 3/2 months by the defense, only, per second, that the defendant was not entitled to bail, because what was necessary was to see that the defense received the motion during the trial. Due to the delay in finalizing the trial, the accused acted like a hopeless and dangerous criminal, who was brutally beaten up after failing to expel the deceased innocent woman. At least 14 people were injured on various parts of his body, therefore, delay in the end of the trial was not justified at bail at such a stage [bail] accordingly the defendant was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Bolan lawyer