BIBI GULLA versus ABDUL HAMID
Constitutional Pakistan 1973 Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Jurisdictional jurisdiction against the orders passed by the Civil Court in review under section 115, the extortioner of the CPC may request constitutional remedy subject to these conditions. That the order was passed under the challenge. Under legal authority and jurisdiction or this order, it was void and was to be used illegally by the authority which was required by law to pass the right order according to the law which under Article 199 of the Constitution There is no restriction on jurisdiction. Contrary to the order passed under revision 115, the constitution of CPC, provided that it was granted without legal jurisdiction / authority or invalid order, was not sustainable in the eyes of the law whenever it was found that Incomplete order was placed from one. Such legal defects, constitutional jurisdiction and Article 199 of the Constitution may be legally invoked by a bereaved individual where the plaintiff claimed to be out of the legacy of his predecessor, the defendants did not enter a written statement Instead, the petition was originally submitted to the defendant to withdraw the order received and file a lawsuit filed by him. Written statement to the defendant rather than dismissing the merits of the trial or keeping the case unresolved before the trial, without giving relevant facts to the plaintiff and guaranteeing a summary summary. The review should have been rejected with the instruction to enter. Trial instability and subsequent trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotri lawyer