JUMMA KHAN versus THE STATE
Sections 435 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Limit) Order 1979 and 439 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 imprisonment, extended the sentence Appellate Court of Appeal Court extended the prison sentence by one year Except for ten streams a year, no notice was issued before the sentence was increased, nor was the state prosecuted for the increase, nor was the state prosecuted in the absence of any action. Had justified his conviction and sentence from the court. The powers to either accept an appeal, reject an appeal, or reduce the sentence awarded by the trial court appellate court were not granted to any arbitrary authority or jurisdiction in which the offender filed an appeal during the appeal. The enhancement was especially without prior notice and giving it a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Thus, the decision of the appellate court was without proper legal authority and without the approval of the High Court over the jurisdiction. Made the decisions in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer