ABDUL JABBAR versus THE STATE
Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Section 46 was fired from a revolver recovered on the eve of the identification of the accused on the testimony of the defendant, but not impossible. Yes, the accused himself took the police to a particular place to retrieve the weapons. Offensively, two free and respected residents of the eligible area to witness the recovery proceedings were charged in their statement (Urdu version) under DOT Wanted S, only in the presence of the Medical Officer and Deputy Tehsildar There was no purpose to falsely implicate, external question did not create nfluence on the victim, punishment and the punishment of the perpetrators were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Timergara lawyer
