Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH

The trial of the accused under Section 17 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Pakistan was not a result of the prosecution's prosecution. The case was recovered by Kalashnikov during an investigation into a case filed under the Ordinance 1979 against the property against the accused. The West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance, 1965, disputed the Kalashnikov's recovery, saying that the recovery of Kalashnikov from the suspect was denied by a competent court, and a special robbery trial was pending against him. The case should not be prosecuted by this court and it should be sent to a general court, in which case it has jurisdiction, in which the accused should be acquitted. The case under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 has been based on the evidence in relation to the offense under Section 13A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, not related to the purpose of determining the adjudication trial forum. Was. In the case of robbery since it did not exclude the offense prescribed by the Schedule to Suppression of Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, which was a specially heard trial by a special court, the constitutional application was excluded Was done. criminal advocate from Chaininda lawyer