Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA ALIAS MUNGAL SINGH versus THE STATE

Crimes against property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13A of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 in the trial of the accused There was no result. At the trial of his robbery robbery case, Kalashnikov was allegedly recovered from the accused during an investigation into a case registered under the Criminal Property Enforcement Ordinance 1979. He was acquitted of Kalashnikov's recovery in a case filed under section 13A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, stating that Kalashnikov's recovery from the accused was denied by a competent court. The trial of a pending robbery in a special court cannot be heard by this court and it can be referred to a general court .A. The jurisdiction of the accused in the case under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, Based on the evidence recorded in connection with the crime under Section 13A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, Was not related to The purpose of determining the forum for the trial of an affiliated robbery case was because it did not exclude the offense prescribed by the Schedule of Suppressing Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, which was specially enforced by the special court. The request for a hearing hearing on was dismissed. Accordingly in the range family advocate from Barkhan lawyer