Find a Lawyer

M. SHAHID SAIGOL versus CONTROLLER OF CAPITAL ISSUES CORPORATE LAW AUTHORITY

Articles 3 (4) and 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of the Capital Issues (Continuity Control) Act, 1947 (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application permitting the Federal Government to issue the correct shares to the respondents (company) of the approved order Valid High Court jurisdiction for legal status test Specific terms for the issuance of valid shares issued by the federal government through governmental guidelines that generally approve orders of approval approved even after the issuance of these terms I may be recommended to be operative and to comply with orders issued under section 3 ()). Because the Act is commonplace in nature, orders were to be issued in light of orders which are the legal status of federally issued and approved orders in relation to the issuance of rights shares, therefore, its validity on the Touchstone of the guidelines. The court was given jurisdiction to determine the legal status of an order approved by the government / public and public authorities at Touchstone on instructions issued by EE. The legality of, because no authority or artist can be prosecuted for infringement S, especially when the right shares have been issued in the interest of the company and its shareholders (to issue the right shares) within one year from the issuance of the correct shares of the preceding issue which the respondent (the company) ) Was also allowed to create the right issue to raise funds for the purchase of the right shares of the respective company, therefore, in passing the order, the said guideline was in conflict with the authority. Question, made all the relevant facts criminal advocate from Phool nagar lawyer