JAM GHULAM MUSTAFA versus MUHAMMAD LATIF
Court Fees Act 1870 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A and 37 (d) Appeal for the return of judicial fees on the return of the appeal was filed for such an appeal on 8/1999 1994 and on 16 5 1994 The withdrawal at the time of court was not practically dismissed and it was soon after the appellant withdrew his appeal, pursuing the pursuit of social justice under Article 2A of the Constitution and his Service, under which he is committed to ensuring cheap and speedy justice. Article (d (d) of the Constitution) demands that the party pay a fee to the court in each case where it has settled its dispute outside the court and withdraw the pending proceedings before the court. In this case, the court will not be burdened with spending its valuable time. In examining the matter, listening to the arguments in this regard, considering the decision and then non. If the time taken to formally write it is not allowed to refund the court fees, they must clearly state the date of the Constitution for its non-return. Instead of referring to the court, he will be punished for assisting in the acquisition. On the appeal note, he is entitled to a cheap and fast justice certificate certificate for the receipt of certain amount by the court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Matiari lawyer